Puberty blockers to be banned based on medical advice

"Puberty blockers for under-18s with gender dysphoria will be banned indefinitely across the UK except for use in clinical trials, Labour has announced. Wes Streeting, the health secretary, said that after receiving advice from medical experts, he would make existing emergency measures banning the sale and supply of puberty blockers indefinite."

What is interesting is that many on both sides of the debate have taken this the wrong way.  Those who feel that Puberty Blockers should be given, even in the absence of decent trials into them when it comes to those under 18 transitioning, feel it is part of the culture war, and those who are against them see it as a victory against woke values.

What it is, is a ban, unless participants are in a clinical trial, which will be continued until evidence is found that any risks are outweighed by the benefits.  It is sad that thanks to the hostility by many on both sides of this divide, that an actual debate cannot take place.  

Personally, I wish that the conversations on this were not as toxic as they are.  Until then, we will have to wait for evidence to come forwards to show the risk/benefit ratio of this treatment for those under the age of eighteen. 

The NHS and US healthcare

Recently, thanks to an assassination/murder, the issues about US healthcare have been in the news again.  Before 2010, I could boast that the NHS was so much better than the US system.  Thanks to fourteen years of the Conservative's running it into the ground, I cannot be as proud of it as I would like.  But, it still is more equitable than the US system and you do not see people trying to assassinate Wes Streeting over it. 

Obama had wanted to make things much better, but US politics diluted the reforms that he wanted.  One thing that would have worked was the mandate to obtain insurance, but that was removed and the US healthcare system did not improve the way it was meant to.  The mandate was actually the idea of Hilary Clinton, but it made so much sense, Obama changed his mind on it and took it on with his proposed plan.  It has worked in many nations to ensure that insurance coverage is universal and affordable.  But since the GOP got rid of the mandate, costs have risen as hospitals have to pay for the increasing numbers of Americans who are not covered by insurance. 

So when the United Healthcare CEO is murdered over the issues with US healthcare, he is not at fault for the system.  The fault with the system lies with the politicians who ruined Obamacare. 

As seen in The Rainmaker and the series, Breaking Bad, there are advantages to universal healthcare which the US misses out on... 

Immaculate

My son had wanted to watch this in the cinema and was annoyed that I would not take him, someone under the age of eighteen, to watch this, a film for those over the age.  After watching this at home, I would have been okay to watch it in there, though of course, not with him as it would not be legal to do so.  

The film starts well and I think it builds up to the final quite well.  I cannot compare it to the films it will be compared to without giving away the plot, but it was quite good and I could not watch the final scene, which is a reflection of how good a film it was.  The Guardian rated it four out of five, and I would have to agree with that.  I am not sure that I will watch it again though. 

Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters

Hmmm...  I would have to say that this was bad, but at times good.  Basically, if you want to watch a fantasy film with guns, then watch this. Apparently it was Paramount's fourth highest-grossing film of 2013, and that is the power of marketing, and the cast.   

I am very glad that I did not pay money to watch it.  Overall, it was a bad film.  If you are a fan of fantasy, I would still say it is worth watching, but only just.  But, I am not the target audience, I think that it is aimed at teenage boys, notably with the occasional nudity and the guns.  It has some good bits with how they presented evil, but overall, this film was a fail in my eyes.  In fact, I would argue that the best bit about it is the trailer. 

Am I going to watch this again?  No.  Never.  

Assisted dying

Our parliament has made a brave decision. While I was in favour of this bill passing, hearing the arguments of those against the bill, using arguments that do not apply to this bill have actually made me support it more. While David Cameron was in favour of the bill, the arguments of many Conservatives that we need better palliative care, when the Conservatives watched NHS performance fall is an interesting one. 

The Nice Guys

I do not understand how this film is not appreciated more. Yes it has continuity errors, notably being dry after being very wet (you will understand if you watch the film). But it has a twisted sense of humour that I love and a decent plot, one which has a few twists and turns. Yes it is slapstick, but the slapstick is clever, and not typical of what you find in American films. The bottom line is that I would be happy to watch this again and would have had no issues paying to watch it in the cinema.  If you have a similar sense of humour to me, watch it. And my daughter and wife seemed to like it as well! 

Life After Beth

 

I watched this film alone. My daughter, who started to watch it with me, decided that it was not for her. I liked it though, but I appreciate that it was too slow for her. I would describe it as a mix of a zombie film and an American art house film. 

I liked the take of a loving family being glad that their daughter was back, and also that they were trying to protect her, especially considering that they lost her once and did not want to lose her again.

If you are after a classic Aubrey Plaza film where she acts a character like she did in Parks and Recreation, you will be disappointed. I think that it was a good take on Zombie comedy, but much slower than Shaun of the Dead, which many will compare it to.